Home > Dpkg Error > Dpkg-split Error Unable To Read Part File

Dpkg-split Error Unable To Read Part File

Contents

Files: 3c0ee1d26bd55362b92eee8e6255aee0 798 base required dpkg_1.10.21.dsc a9f6c43891db74d727beab7dfc0ee663 1682647 base required dpkg_1.10.21.tar.gz e492251ba4cf345982782b7880056e1f 1220962 base required dpkg_1.10.21_i386.deb 132ac9df0f3dd8fd8b7adbf409f8ed3e 105530 base required dselect_1.10.21_i386.deb 48e0a00caea19997c46ad2d7539b2731 137490 utils standard dpkg-dev_1.10.21_all.deb 794381a64e07416e48af7d6bb4ae52d0 10620 doc optional dpkg-doc_1.10.21_all.deb Maybe I'm having problems because I'm trying to install over an older distribution (slackware)? So I went ahead and started attempting 1.0. more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science check over here

For big packages you can start by adding it to the disabled-packages folder, since packages there are not built and uploaded to the apt repo by default, allowing time for people Or perhaps you want to keep your repo to only contain packages ported/compiled by you? Adam, dpkg is pretty new territory for me. etiago commented Apr 19, 2016 Here it is.

Dpkg Error Processing Archive (--install)

English equivalent of the Portuguese phrase: "this person's mood changes according to the moon" What is fungibility and why does it matters? Reply sent to Scott James Remnant : You have taken responsibility. Is the NHS wrong about passwords?

fornwall commented Apr 19, 2016 Can you upload the nodejs-lts_4.4.3_aarch64.deb and link to it so I can try it? Message #24 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Scott James Remnant To: [email protected] Subject: Bug#200701: fixed in dpkg 1.10.21 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:17:03 -0400 Source: dpkg Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Dpkg Error Processing Archive Trying To Overwrite Extracting templates from packages: 29%% Extracting templates from packages: 58%% Extracting templates from packages: 88%% Extracting templates from packages: 100%% Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 5%% (Reading

Reported by: Nicolas Tisserand Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 22:33:05 UTC Severity: important Tags: patch Fixed in version dpkg/1.10.21 Done: Scott James Remnant Bug is archived. Dpkg Error 1 Both from this and from the "Operation not permitted" message, I surmise that the problem is likely not with the file itsself, but with the mechanisms that spring into action when Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pyclean", line 33, in from debpython.namespace import add_namespace_files ValueError: bad marshal data (unknown type code) dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python-problem-report_2.0.1-0ubuntu9_all.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script I sure hope someone can tell me that it's not...

Results 1 to 3 of 3 Thread: apt-get install cannot open .deb files, open(2) fails with EPERM Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Dpkg Error Processing Package Dependency Problems - Leaving Unconfigured After unpacking 168kB of additional disk space will be used. Closes: #214699. * Updated Translations: - Brazilian Portugese (Andre Luis Lopes). Next by Date: Re: testpage.tex Previous by thread: Re: testpage.tex Next by thread: re:Problems with install Index(es): Date Thread Skip to content Ignore Learn more Please note that GitHub no

Dpkg Error 1

Wiping /var/cache/apt did not solve the issue, either (as one might expect). https://support.rstudio.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/200658076-rstudio-0-95-265-amd64-deb-fail-on-Ubuntu-10-04-LTS- I was thinking more along the lines of submitting it (and every other update to the LTS package) as a pull request. Dpkg Error Processing Archive (--install) They are recommended and useful because the title of a Bug is determined using this field. Dpkg Error Processing Package (--configure) Josh Ian Pylvainen December 30, 2013 10:17 0 votes Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ Permalink Powered by Zendesk Log in / Register Ubuntubzr-builddeb package Overview Code Bugs Blueprints Translations Answers bzr-builddeb

ldconfig deferred processing now taking place This has been going on for two weeks now and I cannot get any updates. http://thewebparrots.com/dpkg-error/dpkg-parse-error-in-file.php Or perhaps you want to keep your repo to only contain packages ported/compiled by you? Affecting: bzr-builddeb (Ubuntu) Filed here by: Steve Langasek When: 2010-02-18 Confirmed: 2010-02-18 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Charms Collection Elbuntu Guadalinex Guadalinex Edu Kiwi Linux nUbuntu PLD Linux Tilix tuXlab Ubuntu Preparing to replace libv4lconvert0:i386 0.8.6-1ubuntu1 (using .../libv4lconvert0_0.8.6-1ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... Dpkg Error Processing Archive *.deb (--install)

Ask Ubuntu works best with JavaScript enabled Support Submit a request Sign in Community Topics Posts New post Post 1 follower Legacy 0 rstudio-0.95.265-amd64.deb fail on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS? Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pyclean", line 33, in from debpython.namespace import add_namespace_files ValueError: bad marshal data (unknown type code) dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit Tried the first approach and that worked famouisly. –Elder Geek Dec 9 '15 at 14:30 1 This had no effect for me. this content dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of python-apport: python-apport depends on python-problem-report (>= 0.94); however: Package python-problem-report is not configured yet.

Acknowledgement sent to Nicolas Tisserand : New Bug report received and forwarded. Dpkg Error Processing Cannot Access Archive No Such File Or Directory This worked for me on the Citrix client. Does it fix your problem too?

Googling the error turns up nothing and the only explanation for this I could come up with is that the kernel somehow got borked.

etiago commented Apr 19, 2016 Okay so I managed to actually go all the way through, readjust all the patches for Node v4.4.3 and build the package. To start with I made a copy of the current NodeJS folder and I changed the version to 4.4.3 in the TERMUX_PKG_VERSION, plus I removed all the patches since they were command is not mistyped it should be fine and needn't be considered a last resort: files in /var/cache/apt/archives are just archived (i.e., left over) package files. Dpkg Error Processing Package Teamviewer (--install) dpkg: error processing apport (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Processing triggers for libc-bin ...

How to work on downloaded copies of database tables in QGIS Retrieving values() from a Map of Sets in SOQL query How do I debug an emoticon-based URL? Adv Reply Quick Navigation General Help Top Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support New to nodejs-lts_4.4.3_aarch64.deb.zip etiago commented Apr 19, 2016 Update: the issue seems to be with permissions... have a peek at these guys Unpacking replacement libv4l-0 ...

Then ln -s /usr/bin/python2.7 /usr/bin/python To use python 2 instead. Date Votes 4 comments 0 -rwxrwx--- 1 zona hah 27663562 2012-04-23 13:57 rstudio-0.95.265-amd64.deb Ian Pylvainen December 30, 2013 10:17 0 votes Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ Permalink 0 Zona, I think Thanks! –Mike Grace Jan 20 '14 at 6:36 add a comment| up vote 4 down vote It might be a bug in the python-problem-report package or python-minimal package or a bad You are of course also welcome to submit a pull request for a package without hosting it yourself!

Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 60 Star 313 Fork 104 termux/termux-packages Code Issues 112 Pull requests 19 Projects is there any trick to build the ARM64 packages? Full text and rfc822 format available. Acknowledgement sent to Aurélien Le Provost : Extra info received and forwarded to list.

Be careful about what you're removing (of course). Is that really so? Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pyclean", line 33, in from debpython.namespace import add_namespace_files ValueError: bad marshal data (unknown type code) dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit In the terminal (Ctrl-Alt-T) type: sudo rm /var/cache/apt/archives/python-problem-report_2.0.1-0ubuntu9_all.deb Alternatively you can use: sudo apt-get clean to erase all of the downloaded files in your cache.

The question remains how in the world open(2) would even fail with EPERM, seeing as I seriously doubt "The O_NOATIME flag was specified, but the effective user ID of the caller I'll also give BinTray a look, maybe that's also good enough 👍 fornwall commented Apr 18, 2016 I wasn't aspiring to start my own repo... Closes: #237589. * Correct use of @ARGV within dpkg-scanpackages, allowing -u to work once again. I'll give this a try tomorrow.

Unpacking replacement libv4lconvert0 ... Maybe there's a problem with that file? Closes: #240081. - Spanish dpkg-source manpage (Ruben Porras). Don't understand...

fashionable Board index The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC Powered by phpBB Forum Software © phpBB Group Debian User Forums Skip to content Advanced search The only thing with nodejs is that even though I patched the install.sh script, because nodejs comes by default with npm v2, when we update to npm v3 we have again