Home > Dpkg Error > Dpkg Error Processing Texlive-xetex -configure

Dpkg Error Processing Texlive-xetex -configure

Unpacking texlive-doc-vi (2013.20140314-1) over (2012.20120611-1) ... Notification sent to Raphael Hertzog : Bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:12:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. A third option would be to use the debian-sid whitelisted source, it has other issues though: Preparing to replace locales 2.13+git20120306-3 (using .../locales_2.22-13_all.deb) ... ubuntu rubber asked Oct 27 '15 at 22:28 Jeremy 1184 2 votes 0answers 420 views tlmgr and apt-get I use LaTeX on a computer running Ubuntu Linux 14. check over here

Hypotheses for the likelihood ratio test Standard way for novice to prevent small round plug from rolling away while soldering wires to it Humans as batteries; how useful would they be? Unpacking texlive-latex-extra-doc (2016.20160512-1) over (2016.20160512-1) ... How does an exponent work when it's less than one? asked 1 year ago viewed 203 times active 1 year ago Related 1Problems related with Texlive 2013 Installation2Error with texlive-publishers-doc. http://askubuntu.com/questions/616180/texlive-pstricks-doc-unable-to-install-on-ubuntu-15-04

I compile latex using pdflatex. fragmaster depends on texlive-extra-utils; however: Package texlive-extra-utils is to be removed. I guess the reason is that I am only testing upgrades of texlive-full and texlive, not each and every package by itself. Preparing to unpack .../texlive-plain-extra_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ...

Preparing to unpack .../texlive-luatex_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ... Preparing to unpack .../texlive-metapost_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ... Preparing to unpack .../context_2013.05.28.20130704-3_all.deb ... texlive-xetex depends on texlive-binaries (>= 2012-0).

texlive-latex-extra depends on texlive-binaries (>= 2012-0). Unpacking luatex (0.76.0-3) over ( ... Acknowledgement sent to Norbert Preining : Extra info received and forwarded to list. https://bugs.debian.org/756618 Copy sent to Debian TeX Maintainers . (Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:09:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

texlive-full depends on texlive-doc-base (>= 2012.20120516); however: Package texlive-doc-base is to be remo (Reading database ... 354609 files and directories currently installed.) Removing texlive-doc-base (2012.20120611-1) ... (Reading database ... 354515 files Unpacking texlive-generic-recommended (2013.20140314-1) over (2012.20120611-5) ... learn more… | top users | synonyms 4 votes 0answers 232 views XeLaTeX renders broken text after upgrade to Ubuntu Vivid I recently upgraded to Ubuntu Vivid, which broke the XeLaTeX Toggle useless messagesView this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox Report forwarded to [email protected], Debian TeX Maintainers : Bug#742189; Package texlive-base. (Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:42:06 GMT) Full

texlive-doc-pt depends on texlive-common (>= 2012.20120516). Unable to pass result of one command as argument to another Why did the One Ring betray Isildur? I've created a control file (calles texlive.ctl) for equivs simulating just texlive-latex-base: Section: tex Package: texlive-dummy Provides: texlive-latex-base Description: texlive dummy package This package provides dpkg with the information that there texlive-math-extra depends on texlive-binaries (>= 2012-0).

Preparing to unpack .../texlive-fonts-recommended_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ... http://thewebparrots.com/dpkg-error/dpkg-error-processing-top-configure.php Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian TeX Maintainers : Bug#742189; Package texlive-base. (Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:09:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. Why are Exp[3] and 2 treated differently within Complex? I've been using LaTeX on OS-X using the TeXWorks editor.

texlive-doc-tr depends on texlive-doc-base (>= 2012.20120516). Need to get 0 B/85.6 MB of archives. So can I import the ... this content Why QEMU can't allocate the memory if the Linux caches are too big?

I've tested this control file for equivs:
Section: tex
Package: texlive-dummy
Provides: tex-common, texlive-common, texlive-latex-base, texlive-metapost, texlive-xetex, texlive-base-bin, texlive-base-bin-doc
Description: texlive dummy package
This package dpkg: texlive-bibtex-extra: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested: texlive-full depends on texlive-bibtex-extra (>= 2015); however: Package texlive-bibtex-extra is to be removed. Acknowledgement sent to Raphael Hertzog : New Bug report received and forwarded.

dpkg: texlive-doc-base: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested: texlive-doc-cs+sk depends on texlive-doc-base (>= 2012.20120516).

fonts ubuntu texlive-2016 answered Sep 17 at 13:51 MYaseen208 2,39453369 0 votes 1answer 187 views Texmaker - I can't compile any .tex (moderncv, other) [closed] I've worked with TeXmaker for several Preparing to unpack .../texlive-fonts-recommended-doc_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ... texlive-doc-pl depends on texlive-doc-base (>= 2012.20120516). A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached.

If you have further comments please address them to [email protected], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. I tried your method on Kubuntu Jaunty, but it does not work for me. Unpacking texlive-latex-base (2013.20140314-1) over (2012.20120611-5) ... have a peek at these guys Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc.

dvipng depends on texlive-base-bin; however: Package texlive-base-bin is not installed.